Re: [-empyre-] What is Bare Life?
On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Christina McPhee wrote:
Indeed, Auschwitz - a space in which the state of exception became
the norm, where law was completely suspended - marks the end and
the ruin of every ethics of dignity and conformity to a norm. The
bare life to which human beings were reduced neither demands nor
conforms to anything. It itself is the only norm; it is absolutely
immanent. And 'the ultimate sentiment of belonging to the species'
cannot in any sense be a kind of dignity.[viii]
The Muselmann, Agamben concludes, the most extreme expression of
this new knowledge, is the guard on the threshold of a new ethics
that begins where dignity ends.
(...) With our political order turning into a state of emergency,
or state of exception, Agamben argues, this bare life, trembling
on the threshold between the human and the inhuman, "becomes both
subject and object of the conflicts of the political order, the
one place for both the organization of State power and
emancipation from it."[ix] Corpus is a two-faced being.
excerpted from "Bare Life and the Occupied Body" by Diane Enns,
Theory & Event, 7.3, 2004
Christina asked me about "art_room",
Erotic emotions and fears in the anonymous exchange 'ask me
anything you want to know about contemporary art.?" would it be
different if we substituted 'anything you want to know about
guantanamo?'
yes, it would be very different if the sentence was: 'anything you
want to know about guantanamo?'.
I am very disturbed about what is the concept behind that...a place
without international laws...what would Kant think of this? He, who
imagined the Society of Nations?
---------------------------------------------
susana mendes silva
www.susanamendessilva.com
arslonga@netcabo.pt
(+351) 917218012
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.